The Truth About Physics And Religion :: essays research papers

The Truth About Physics and ReligionMany race believe that physics and trust are separate entities.They film that physics deals only with the objective, material world, while morality deals only with the world of values. It is obvious, from these, andfrom some separate comparisons, that conflicts have arisen between physics andreligion. Many are convinced that the two fields completely oppose each other,and are not related in any ways. Many people, who follow a particular religion,feel offended by the claims that physicists have made, while physicists believethat religion has no basis in reality. I will show, however, that theseconflicts are founded on a misinterpret, and that there is no divisionbetween physics and religion. I will also prove that the misunderstanding liesin the parables of religion and in the statements made by physicists.Furthermore, I will show that only physicists can really know the truth ofphysics, and only sacred followers can know the truth of that r eligioneveryone else has to take it on faith.Many people believe that physics and religion are entirely separate.They claim that physics is only concerned with discovering what is true or false,while religion is concerned with what is good or evil. Scientists appear toagree that physics is the manner in which we argue about the objective side ofreality. Religious followers, on the other hand, agree that religion is theway we express the subjective decisions that help us claim the standards bywhich we live. Although these definitions seem to be contrasting, an importantelement remains absent, an element that must first be considered before religionand physics can be compared.Those who think that religion has no basis in reality also believe thatthere is an obvious separation between the two fields. They think thatreligion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. Paul Dirac,a physicist, once saidThe very idea of God is a crop of the humanimagination. It is quite un derstandable why primitivepeople, who were so much more exposed to theoverpowering forces of nature than we are today,should have personified these forces in fright andtrembling. But nowadays, when we understand somany natural processes, we have no need for suchsolutions.Dirac, and those who think the same way, however, fails to consider theessential element that has caused many to misunderstand the relationship betweenphysics and religion. What they fail to realize is that religion uses languagein quite a different way from science. The language of religion is more closelyrelated to the language of poetry than to the language of science.