Why should we apply the death penalty to the remaining younger brother Essay

Why should we apply the death penalty to the remaining younger brother who did the Boston marathon bombing or why shouldnt we - Essay Example This remaining criminal, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, after confirmation of the crime will be punished by the death penalty according to the United States Attorney General Eric Holder who detailed charges for the 19-year old survivor. In support of this statement, this essay will provide an argumentative analysis on the plight of the criminal with death as the alternative penalty. ARGUMENT Mere punishments, such as life imprisonment, for the person like Dzhokhar Tsarnaev might not be a better punishment because his action is a serious humanity crime. Humanity crime that involves killing is a weighty offence that needs instant penalties. In such cases people who cause a grave public disturbance should face a charge equal to the crime committed. Causing death to innocent people shows that the violators do not value the life of other people (Kotz n.pag.). This, therefore, implies that this person should be subjected to death penalty as a lesson to the other criminals alleged with the same crime. Some criminals do not forget their usual activities even after maltreatment in the cell, and, thus, it is necessary for the court to raise concerns for the applicable punishment for such criminals. We might argue that the remaining criminal has learned a lesson after the death of his brother (Kotz n.pag.). People who point guns at the police mean that they have the capability shooting other people because now they despise the police force.